Meetings
in Jan/Feb/March 2012
Jan 2012 Committee on the Rights of Child (CRC) / 59th session 16 Jan - 3 Feb 2012, Geneva
Azerbaijan, Cook Islands, Madagascar, Myanmar, Niue Islands, Thailand, Togo OPSC: Azerbaijan, Thailand, Togo OPAC: Azerbaijan, DRC, Thailand
Feb 2012 Pre-sessional WG - CRC / 60th session 6 - 10 Feb 2012, Geneva
Albania, Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Canada, Guinea-Buissau, Liberia, Namibia OPSC: Albania, Canada, Philippines OPAC: Albania
Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) / 51st session 13 Feb - 2 March 2012, Geneva
Algeria, Brazil, Grenada, Jordan, Norway, Rep. of Congo, Zimbabwe
Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) / 80th session 13 Feb - 9 March 2012, Geneva
Canada, Italy, Israel, Jordan Kuwait, Laos, Mexico, Portugal, Qatar, Senegal, Turkmenistan and Viet Nam
Sub-Committee on Prevention of Torture (SPT) / 16th session 20 - 24 Feb 2012, Geneva
March 2012 Pre-Session Working Group CEDAW / 52nd session 5 - 9 March 2012, Geneva
WG on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances (WGEID) / 96th session 12 - 16 March 2012
Human Rights Committee (CCPR) / 104th session 12 - 30 March 2012, New York
Cape Verde, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Turkmenistan, Yemen Task Force: Bosnia & Herzegovina, Paraguay, Portugal, Philippines
Committee on Enforced Disappearances (CED) / 2nd session 26 - 30 March 2012, Geneva
|
Reporting Schedue By Month: Jan: CRC
Feb: CEDAW, CERD
Mar: CCPR, CED
Apr: CMW, CRPD
May: CAT, CMW, CRPD
July: CCPR, CEDAW
Aug: CERD
Sept: CRC
Oct: CCPR, CEDAW, CMW, CRPD
Nov: CAT, CESCR
By Treaty Body: CRC: Jan/May/Sept
CEDAW: Feb/July/Oct
CERD: Feb/Aug
CCPR: March/July/Oct
CMW: April/Oct
CRPD: April/Oct
CESCR: May/Nov
CAT: May/Nov
For more on Reporting Schedule Click Here |
United Nations
Human Rights Treaties
There are 9 treaty bodies that monitor compliance of the 9
core UN human
rights treaties that are in force. Most of the
treaties are supplemented by optional protocols dealing with specific
concerns. The majority of the optional protocols relate to a procedure
where individuals and groups can submit complaints. The
optional
protocols are also monitered by the same treaty body as the treaty to
which they are a
supliment to. OP-CAT is an exception as it has its own monitering body:
the Subcommittee on Prevention of
Torture (SPT). For an overview of treaty bodies,
click
here
The latest treaty to enter into force is the International Convention
for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance. This
convention entered into force on 23 Dec 2010.
1. ICERD,
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial
Discrimination, EIF: 4 January 1969
Monitoring Body:
CERD
2. ICCPR,
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, EIF: 23
March 1976
2a. ICCPR-OP1,
Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights, EIF: 23 March 1976,
2b. ICCPR-OP2,
Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights, aiming at the
abolition of the death penalty, EIF:15 Dec 1989
Monitoring Body:
CCPR
3. ICESCR,
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights,
EIF: 3
January 1976
Monitoring Body:
CESCR
4. CEDAW,
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against
Women, EIF: 3 September
1981
4a. Optional Protocol
to the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women,
EIF: 22 December 2000
Monitoring Body:
CEDAW
5. CAT,
Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment, EIF: 26 June 1987
Monitoring Body:
CAT
5a. OP-CAT,
Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel,
Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or
Punishment, EIF: 22 June 2006
Monitoring Body:
SPT
6. CRC,
Convention on the Rights of the Child, EIF: 2 September 1990
6a. OP-CRC-AC,
Optional protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the
involvement of children in armed
conflict, EIF: 12 February 2002
6b. OP-CRC-SC,
Optional protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the
sale of children, child prostitution
and child pornography, EIF: 18 January 2002
Monitoring Body:
CRC
7. ICRMW,
International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant
Workers and Members of Their Families, EIF: 1 June 2003
Monitoring Body:
CMW
8. ICRPD,
International Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities,
EIF: 13 Dec 2006
8a. Optional Protocol
to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, EIF: 30
March
2007
Monitoring Body:
CRPD
9. ICED, International Convention for the
Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, EIF:
23 Dec 2010
Monitoring Body:
CED
Note: Beside
the treaty bodies there are two
Working
Groups that Treaty Body Report will follow:
1. WGAD,
Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
2. WGEID,
Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances
There
is one treaty that are not yet in force
3a. Optional Protocol
to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights,
NOT IN FORCE
Text of the Convention contained in A/RES/63/117 of 10 December 2008.
The Convention was open for signature from 24 September 2009.
As of Jan 2011 there are 3 state parties.
Overview
of Monitoring
bodies -- Treaty Bodies
Note: The
document, HRI/MC/2007/4 -- Report on the Working Methods of the Human
Rights Treaty Bodies Relating to
the State Party Reporting Process, is an excellent resource for
information about treaty bodies. The document is
produced by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for
Human Rights (OHCHR) in collaboration with the
Division for the Advancement of Women (DAW).
Annual Reports
Guidelines for preparing reports
General Comments/Recommendations
List of Issues
Summary Records
Concluding Observations
Periodicity of reports
Complaint Procedures
Membersip & Meetings of States
Parties
Annual
Reports
Each treaty body prepares an Annual report (except CRC), which is
submitted to the
General Assembly. The Annual Report lists the number sessions
held during the reporting year and all documentation pertaining to the
respective sessions. The Annual report
usually covers a period of twelve months and may or may not coincide
with a calendar year.
Note: The CMW has started to
hold two sessions since 2005 due to the increase in state party reports
submitted. The Committee first began to meet in April 2004
Depending on the
Committee, typically the Annual report consists of organizational
issues: number of sessions, membership and
attendance of the committee; list of the state party reports
considered; the text of the concluding
observations, if any; text of any General Comment adopted; List of
state parties to the convention;etc.,
Annual Reports are
sent to the General Assembly, and therefore become a Official Record of
the General Assembly. The Symbol
for General Assembly documents always starts with an “A” then the
“number of the General Assembly
session”, and then the “document number”.
Guidelines
on preparing
reports
Each committee issues a set of guidelines, which States Parties need to
follow when submitting their report. For a
list, please look
under each treay body. In May 2006, the
Inter-Committee Technical Working Group established by the fourth
inter-committee meeting and the seventeenth
meeting of chairpersons of human rights treaty bodies, prepared a
harmonized guidelines on reporting under
international human rights treaties. These guidelines, HRI/MC/2006/3,
are used in preparing the Common Core
Document that is required by all treaty bodies.
General
Comments/Recommendations
General Comments/Recommendations are guidelines for States Parties on
the interpretation of specific aspects of the human rights
treaty of concern to the particular committee.
General
Comments/Recommendation clarify the content of treaty rights in more
detail, may outline potential
violations of those
rights and offer advice to states parties on how best to comply with
their obligations under
the treaties.
- CERD and CEDAW refer to
these guidelines as "General Recommendations”
- CCPR, CESCR, CAT and CRC refer to them
as "General Comments"
- CMW has yet to issue any General
Comments/Recommendation
Usually States
Parties have to take into consideration the General
Comments/Recommendations when they
prepare their
periodic reports.
List
of issues
A list of issues is prepared by a treaty body in advance of the
consideration of state report and submitted to the state party. The
list of issues is prepared based on the state party report, information
provided by UN Specialized agencies, NGOs,
individuals etc. Lists of issues provide an opportunity for States
parties to supplement the information
contained in their report and also provide a guide to States parties on
the line of questioning they are likely to face
when their report is formally considered.
NGOs wanting to
write a report should ideally send their report before the committee
formulates the list of issues. This should
give the committee and the secretariat enough time to read the NGO
report and include questions, it they
think one is warranted, in the list of issues.
Summary
Records
There are no verbatim records for proceedings of the meetings of the
committees. Instead, a summary of the meeting is produced,
which is called Summary Records. These records are only available for
open/public meetings.
The Summary Records
are important as they give an indication as to how government
delegations respond to questions posed by
the committee and what type of questions the committee is
asking.
Concluding
observations
The committee issues concluding observations after examining a state
party report. In general, these take the following structure:
* introduction;
* positive aspects;
* principal subjects of concern; and,
* suggestions and recommendations.
Concluding
observations may also include factors and difficulties impeding the
implementation of the treaty, a request for their
wide dissemination in the State party concerned, and a paragraph may be
included requesting that additional
information be provided to the respective committee by a specified
deadline (usually one year), or on specific points
of the concluding observations The Concluding
Observation, highlight areas which should be given priority by the
state. In certain circumstances the committee might
ask the state to report back within a specified timeframe –- 6 months
to 1 year –- on follow-up information.
Please look at
specific treaty bodies for how individual committees address concluding
observations.
Periodicity
of Reports
States Parties, after
ratification, have to submit an "initial report outining measures taken
to give effect to its obligations under the convention and on the
progress made in that regard". Subsiquent reports must report
on progress made and "indicate factors and difficulties affecting the
degree of fulfilment of obligations".
The reporting cycle varies for each treaty. And the respective
committees can request a report from a state party at any time.
- CERD --
Initial report to be submitted 1 year after ratification; subsequent
reports every 2 years
- CCPR, CEDAW, CAT -- Initial report
to be submitted 1 year after ratification; subsequent reports every 4
years
- CMW -- Initial
report to be submitted 1 year after ratification; subsequent reports
every 5 years
- CRPD
-- Initial report to be submitted 2 year after ratification;
subsequent reports every 4 years
- CESCR --
Initial report to be submitted 2 year after ratification; subsequent
reports every 5 years
Membership
&
Meetings of States Parties
States Parties to a treaty meet periodically to elect members of the
Committee. Committee members serve in their personal
capacity and act independently. Committee members do not act as
representatives of the State Party who nominate
them. Term of committee members vary from treaty body to treat body,
and they they can be re-elected.
Usually in regard to the composition of the Committee, due
consideration must be given to equitable geographical distribution and
to the representation of different forms of social and legal systems.
CCPR, CESCR, CERD,
CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW: 4 year terms, eligible for re-election (no
limits);
CRPD: 4 year terms,
eligible for re-election once;
Note: For
information on committee members of a particuler committee, please go
to the committee's page.
State Parties who have nominated nationals as independent experts to
the various monitoring bodies -- as of Jan 2012:
| CERD |
CCPR |
CESCR |
CEDAW
|
CAT |
CRC |
CMW |
CRPD | CED |
Algeria
Brazil
Burkina Faso
China
Colombia
France
Guatemala
India
Ireland
Niger
Pakistan
Romania
Russia
Tanzania
Togo
Turkey
UK
USA
|
Algeria Argentina Colombia Egypt France Ireland Japan Mauritius (Morocco) Romania South Africa Suriname Sweden (Switzerland) Netherlands (Tunisia) UK USA
|
Algeria
Belarus
Cameroon
China
Colombia
Costa Rica
Ecuador
Egypt
France
Germany
India
Jordan
Mauritius
Netherlands
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Russia
|
Afghanistan Algeria Bangladesh Brazil China Croatia Cuba Egypt Finland France India Israel Jamaica Japan Kenya Mauritius Paraguay Romania Slovenia Spain Switzerland Timor Leste Turkey |
Chile
China
Cyprus
Ecuador
Italy
Morocco
Norway
Senegal
Spain
USA
|
Chile Egypt Ghana Hungary Mauritius Monaco Norway Peru Rep. of Korea Saudi Arabia Slovakia Spain Sri Lanka Switzerland Syria Thailand Tunisia Uganda
|
Algeria Azerbaijan Burkina Faso Ecuador Egypt Guatemala Jamaica Mali Morocco Peru Philippines Senegal Sri Lanka Turkey
|
Algeria Australia Bangladesh Chile China Denmark Ecuador Germany Guatemala Hungary Jordan Kenya Mexico Qatar Rep. of Korea Serbia Spain Tunisia
| Albania Argentina France Germany Iraq Japan Senegal Spain Uruguay Zambia
|
| 18 |
15 |
18 |
23 |
10 |
18 |
14 |
18 | 10 |
| | | | | | | | |